Search TSL and the Web:
 Lijit Search
Home Subscribe Renew Contact Us Help Archives Links Our Sponsors




Plastic Tailgate
Bowls (3-pack)
$10.99
Click to order

Click here for sale items

Crutchfield Sponsors TechSideline.com

Chick-Fil-A Bowl Tickets



You are not logged in | login | create account
TechSideline.com Women's Basketball Message Board
  powered by  
  Register to Post  
Report Abuse  
Subject: After a second look, this doesn't tell much of the story at all
Posted by: amptech on Tue Feb 9 2010 7:45:08 AM
Message:

Kind of like "salaries" vs total benefits package and official school
expenses rather than total school and booster expenses.

It also does not have an equal basis to make an accounting for. For
instance, looking at the breakouts there is Endowments and Investments
and only one school have anything there, that's us with $102,000.
Everyone else is 0, even UVA who the report says spends right at
$5,000,000 annually according to the report. Another head scratcher
is "Media Rights" Where there are only 2 and ours is $86,000. Now if
you believe that UNC WBBall has no endowment money or investments
available to them and gets nothing from media rights then go ahead.

These number indicate to me this is far from an accurate picture of
what each school and staff has available and is more a public
accounting of just what a public institution's part of the support of
the team is.

Other head scratchers, GT spends $557,731 on student aid. UNC spends
$370,864 and Duke and the private schools aren't listed BTW. I am
sure that is due to the stated cost of tuition at each school.

Current Thread:

   Any one in the know about WBB budgets?  --  amptech   Mon Feb 8 2010 7:14:32 PM
       Paying BD more is not going to make her a better coach. Move on. **  --  Jethro Tull   Tue Feb 9 2010 8:10:10 AM
           Who said anything about paying BD more?  --  amptech   Tue Feb 9 2010 3:56:52 PM
               No offense, but I am up to here with the "better facilities" line  --  Jethro Tull   Tue Feb 9 2010 4:59:15 PM
                   Anybody who compares BD tough time as analogous to CFB is certifiably insane **  --  RhodeIslandHokie   Tue Feb 9 2010 6:51:58 PM
                   Sorry you are  --  amptech   Tue Feb 9 2010 5:34:29 PM
                       You may not know, but most of us know that BD has had average money to work with  --  KnoxHokie   Tue Feb 9 2010 10:45:47 PM
       Last general public data was for 04-05-See Link  --  KnoxHokie   Mon Feb 8 2010 8:22:49 PM
           According to the financial reports that Randy Jones does for us...  --  Will Stewart      Wed Feb 10 2010 7:18:56 AM
               Thanks-Does he have the WBB coach's salaries? **  --  KnoxHokie   Wed Feb 10 2010 2:04:54 PM
           So "limited resources" can't be an excuse by HD for program's mediocrity **  --  RhodeIslandHokie   Mon Feb 8 2010 9:49:08 PM
               Isn't enough to expect them to soar either  --  amptech   Mon Feb 8 2010 9:54:05 PM
                   How MD or UNC became national powers with less resources than VT is an anomaly **  --  RhodeIslandHokie   Mon Feb 8 2010 10:49:12 PM
                       Now that is funny **  --  amptech   Tue Feb 9 2010 7:04:05 AM
           Sorry about the running together, but I don't know how to make tables work here- **  --  KnoxHokie   Mon Feb 8 2010 8:24:14 PM
               After a second look, this doesn't tell much of the story at all  --  amptech   Tue Feb 9 2010 7:45:08 AM
                   Supposedly, these are expenditures, not investments-  --  KnoxHokie   Tue Feb 9 2010 8:18:48 AM
               Thank you **  --  amptech   Mon Feb 8 2010 9:45:26 PM





You must log in before you can reply to a message.
Please login or create an account if you wish to reply.


TechSideline.com is an independent publication and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or financially supported by Virginia Tech or the Virginia Tech Athletic Department. All material is Copyright © 1996-2010 by TechSideline.com, all rights reserved.

TechSideline.com Privacy Policy

TSL Home