Maybe the "Merryman Center" didn't try very hard to be as objective as the writer of this article. I work with lots of people that I wouldn't "invite over for dinner," and vice versa. We give JW too much leeway and benefit of the doubt. Are we getting any inside information on him or is everyone, except Beamer, of course, who has a 'get out of JW's doghouse free' card, afraid of him. The article actually supports SG much more than people give credit. We just don't get any particulars why things went sour (south?); pun intended.