Become a TSL Sponsor

Banner Ad

 Forgot Password?
Interesting article about dynamic between Slive and Delaney and impact on playoff...
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
  1. #1

    Join Date
    July 17, 2001
    Location
    Hughesville, MD
    Posts
    11,694

    Interesting article about dynamic between Slive and Delaney and impact on playoff...


  2. #2
    PadrosWindup's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 16, 2003
    Posts
    4,761
    Quote Originally Posted by HokieNC View Post
    Sounds like the most Swofford can due is facilitate the negotiations - Slive and Swofford will be making the decisions.
    From what I hear, you couldn't hit water if you fell out of a boat.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    October 07, 1999
    Posts
    50,453
    Quote Originally Posted by PadrosWindup View Post
    Sounds like the most Swofford can due is facilitate the negotiations - Slive and Swofford will be making the decisions.
    We have two alpha males in the commissioner negotiations. Slive & Delaney.

    We have two lesser dogs following those two.

    Then we have all the pups, and yes ACC is one of the pups.

  4. #4
    reestuart's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 07, 1999
    Location
    roanoke, va
    Posts
    59,372
    Quote Originally Posted by Atlee Hokie View Post
    We have two alpha males in the commissioner negotiations. Slive & Delaney.

    We have two lesser dogs following those two.

    Then we have all the pups, and yes ACC is one of the pups.
    If anything, Scott will be a big advantage over the Big XII guy.
    "Knowledge is good"

    --Emil Faber, 1904

  5. #5

    Join Date
    January 01, 2005
    Posts
    1,470
    Agreed on the pups comment. At best the ACC is 5th.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    August 01, 2005
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    858
    Quote Originally Posted by HokieNC View Post
    If I read this correctly, it looks like the 4 conferences may be at a grid lock (PAC12/B1G vs. SEC/Big XII), with the ACC deciding which side to join. I would not be surprised if Slive pulls a favor for the ACC in the coming days to make us join their side in the debate. Hmmm.... maybe an SEC vs. ACC challenge?

  7. #7
    Captain Terrific's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 01, 2005
    Posts
    767
    Quote Originally Posted by Suffhokian View Post
    If I read this correctly, it looks like the 4 conferences may be at a grid lock (PAC12/B1G vs. SEC/Big XII), with the ACC deciding which side to join. I would not be surprised if Slive pulls a favor for the ACC in the coming days to make us join their side in the debate. Hmmm.... maybe an SEC vs. ACC challenge?
    If the SEC thinks it's in their best interests to have a foothold in the mid Atlantic region, then nothing will stop Slive from getting two ACC teams.

    ACC will get no rescue from the SEC.

  8. #8
    DarylS's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 08, 1999
    Posts
    2,546
    I'm sure Swofford will play an important role, ordering lunch, making sure everybody got what they ordered, and arranging dinner reservations. Maybe they will even give him an 1/2 hour about the benefits of basketball and how it can help fill the early Spring void after football season.

    He can also tell the other commissioners what it is like to see your conference members get pounded on an annual basis in big games and how Miami and FSU are back.

    Quote Originally Posted by PadrosWindup View Post
    Sounds like the most Swofford can due is facilitate the negotiations - Slive and Swofford will be making the decisions.
    There is the distinct possibility that I don't like you. But, don't take it personally.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    July 03, 2001
    Posts
    102,720
    4 conferences simply won't work for an infinite pot of reasons starting with geography

    Say you want to get to 4 mega conferences, you need each conference to carry 16-20 teams. How on earth will you achieve that?

    P10 adds TT, tu, OU, Okie St
    B10 adds Iowa St, KSU, KU, ND
    SEC adds Miami, FSU, CU, + GT
    ACC adds Lewisville, Cincy, UConn, + SUNJ
    (B12 most likely to implode because it touches 3 conf, if you want to get rid of ACC - we'd slide to B10/SEC and then B12 gets more BE leftovers)

    Aside from the absurdity of B10 ading Iowa St + KSU (and ACC's additions), you now get to fill in the rest of the schools (TCU, WVU, and whatever midmajors/BE schools you want). You'll end up with a lot of these conferences adding schools they have nothing in common with aside from a football team.

    Keep the conferences as they sit today. If you want the playoff to happen, make it a *REAL* playoff... top 16 BCS teams get it. Rewrite bylaws to include practice/gms in Jan and you're done. Oh, and pay the players so the farce that has become "student athletes" at big time university programmes can finally be stopped.

  10. #10
    PadrosWindup's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 16, 2003
    Posts
    4,761
    Quote Originally Posted by 133193Hokie View Post
    Agreed on the pups comment. At best the ACC is 5th.
    Still not sure if the ACC is the weakest BCS conference, or the strongest non-BCS conference.
    From what I hear, you couldn't hit water if you fell out of a boat.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •