Any chance of staying in the ACC even if Clemson and FSU join the Big 12 and the SEC pursues us?
Results 1 to 10 of 20
Thread: Stech, do you see
Hybrid View
-
Sun May 20 2012, 12:07 PM #1
- Join Date
- April 12, 2006
- Posts
- 1,658
Stech, do you see
-
Sun May 20 2012, 12:28 PM #2
- Join Date
- February 16, 2001
- Posts
- 14,659
The end game for the ACC has been obvious to me since 2003...if they can get Notre Dame to join they will create their goal, the Big Conference Ivy. If they can do that, then Clemson and FSU aren't going anywhere. If they can't then the chances of Clemson and FSU bolting league get greater and if they go, then the ACC teams may jump.
I will throw you a little bit of a surprise in thinking that many will probably disagree with me on this which is why I post the way I post. I think ND knows that they will have to be in the conference to get to the National Championship in football and with ND being a very private school academically oriented they want the ACC to be in the Big 4 and they know that if they go to the ACC that will seal the deal. That said, their big donors aren't the easiest people to deal with...just ask FSU about that one. So the moves have to be done very very carefully.
-
Sun May 20 2012, 12:37 PM #3
-
Sun May 20 2012, 01:08 PM #4
The only way to get ND into a conference is to make it the only way to the playoff. The only way to get them into the ACC is for them to realize it is now or never. The ACC may be dead in a year. Lots of stuff going on. ND wants to be the king of its realm. Would it be the B1G? No. Would it be the Big XII? No. The only conference where they could throw their weight around is the ACC. Let them think that and get them in first. Then they will be much easier to put in their place. Just like the ACC did with Miami.
-
Sun May 20 2012, 12:41 PM #5Hokie!
- Join Date
- December 10, 2006
- Posts
- 1,695
Lets say ND and Rutgers by some stroke of luck come into the ACC...
How does that really help? I am sure whatever is done to "sweeten" the TV deal will flow directly into the 1st National Bank of South Bend. With respect to playoffs and bowls, the ACC champ will still need to be undefeated to get into a 4 team playoff, and there are no high profile bowl tie-ins left. MAYBE, ND to the ACC changes the discussion to a 6 team playoff? I just don't see it becuase some schools cound end up playing upwards of 16 games: 12 regular season games + conference championship + play in game + semifinal + NC game. I am not challenging you, I just don't see all of the moving parts here.
Last edited by Maroon Effect; Sun May 20 2012 at 07:59 PM.
-
Sun May 20 2012, 01:05 PM #6
- Join Date
- January 01, 2005
- Posts
- 1,488
The Big 4 have drawn the line in the sand. I am sure they are telling ND and the ACC teams that they will never agree to a playoff beyond 4 teams. They want to pick off ND and a selection of ACC teams. They need for the ACC to feel the heat.
-
Sun May 20 2012, 01:12 PM #7
- Join Date
- July 17, 2001
- Location
- Hughesville, MD
- Posts
- 11,694
-
Sun May 20 2012, 12:43 PM #8
- Join Date
- April 12, 2006
- Posts
- 1,658
I understand and I just don't want to see our football product take a hit. I understand the academic side of things and how they are important, but sometimes its hard to find a happy medium. However, I do feel like without Clemson, FSU, and/or Notre Dame, enrollment numbers could take a hit being in such a weak football conference as we all know there is a positive correlation with enrollment numbers and the football product. That would be a pro going to the SEC because you could see more kids applying at least for the next few years with the excitement that a new conference like the SEC would add. That being said, we should all know by the end of of July where everyone stands. If it doesn't happen by the end of July then it's probably not going to happen in my opinion. Thanks for the scoop.
-
Sun May 20 2012, 04:06 PM #9
- Join Date
- January 01, 2005
- Posts
- 14,379
-
Sun May 20 2012, 05:12 PM #10
- Join Date
- December 30, 2003
- Posts
- 15,541


Reply With Quote


