end of the day, it isn't worth it imo. in the grand scheme of things, unless we go to 4x 16tm leagues as mandated by the US Congress, there will be 5 conferences - distances, interests, etc will maintain that. B1G doesn't want more teams. P10 doesn't want more teams unless tu decides to move west. SEC is probably happy where they are. So who is left? If B12 wants FSU/CU, then ACC picks up some combination of ND/UConn/SUNJ. Odds are B12 also picks up Lewsiville and Cincy to get to 14 teams.
End of the day, nothing changes. You still see the same teams lining up to play VT (losing a home game vs FSU every 4 years doesn't even register as a meaningful loss to me). We still have a great home for our athletics (easy drives to MD, UVA, WF, Dook, UNC, + NCSU for most folks in our "core") and a home that fits. People are trying to make things too hard.
Results 21 to 30 of 36
Thread: Slive's Move is Brilliant
-
Sat May 19 2012, 05:52 PM #21
- Join Date
- July 03, 2001
- Posts
- 102,720
-
Sat May 19 2012, 08:20 PM #22
- Join Date
- March 18, 2004
- Posts
- 247
Yeah except most VT fans don't want to go to those games.
-
Sat May 19 2012, 08:23 PM #23
- Join Date
- October 07, 1999
- Posts
- 17,683
A lot of people on the Clemson boards are saying they're Big 12 (or whatever it is) bound, and that VT is the SEC's first choice. I peek in on their board quite often and have learned who to give credence to when they post. These posts are coming from some of those people.
Last edited by Nortazhokie; Sat May 19 2012 at 10:13 PM.
"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first." Ronald Reagan
-
Sat May 19 2012, 08:28 PM #24
- Join Date
- May 21, 2003
- Location
- Richmond, VA
- Posts
- 28,379
I agree completely LSU Tiger. If they had asked me, we'd already BE in the SEC. SEC is the "Lead Dog". The problem is that unless you ARE the lead dog, the view never changes....I'd hate to spend my days looking at another dog's butt!!
I hoped for the SEC back when we were flirting with the ACC. I'd have preferred the SEC back then! I'm a football guy. Basketball is something to me that you do between football and spring football! ACC is a BB Conference FIRST! That will never change! Problem is, although I'm not the only one, there appear to be too many (including perhaps the MOST influential Hokies) who coveted the ACC for so long, that they plan to ride it all the way to Second Tier status.. I hope I am wrong!! I really hope I am wrong!
-
Sat May 19 2012, 08:36 PM #25
- Join Date
- November 29, 2007
- Posts
- 59
-
Sat May 19 2012, 08:41 PM #26
-
Sat May 19 2012, 09:11 PM #27
-
Sat May 19 2012, 09:13 PM #28
- Join Date
- January 05, 2001
- Posts
- 5,683
I think the Big Ten wants Georgia Tech and, if I ran Georgia Tech, that's where I would want to go if the ACC broke up. Problem for the Big Ten is which four of the following five schools to select to reach 16: Notre Dame, UVa, UNC, Duke and Georgia Tech. Maryland might have an outside shot in lieu of UVa. I think the UNC/Duke combo is almost a sure thing for the Big Ten. I know Duke football blows, but the Big Ten would take that albatross to get into the Carolina market and have basketball matchups between UNC, Duke, and the traditional B1G hoops schools like Indiana.
-
Sat May 19 2012, 09:16 PM #29
- Join Date
- January 05, 2001
- Posts
- 5,683
If this continues, lots of folks in the SEC East are going to miss playing Bama and LSU on a frequent basis . . . .
-
Sat May 19 2012, 10:04 PM #30
- Join Date
- July 03, 2001
- Posts
- 102,720
Must just be me but I like the ACC, I really do. I like playing Pitt, Syr, MD, UVA, UNC, NCSU, WF, BC, etc (all but Dook really). I like the way the conference feels.


Reply With Quote


