In other words, recruit service consenus was that they were MM but a few such MM are actually better than than. Works both ways. Some of the D-1 talent ends up being MM caliber players.
Quote Originally Posted by JEdge04 View Post
This is probably an stupid question, but i've been wondering... We keep talking about how MM kids wouldn't make it in the ACC and would likely ride the bench. If that is the case (other than a few exceptions of kids outperforming their evaluations), then why are MM's so dang successful in the NCAA tourny against HM teams?