In other words, recruit service consenus was that they were MM but a few such MM are actually better than than. Works both ways. Some of the D-1 talent ends up being MM caliber players.
Originally Posted by JEdge04
This is probably an stupid question, but i've been wondering... We keep talking about how MM kids wouldn't make it in the ACC and would likely ride the bench. If that is the case (other than a few exceptions of kids outperforming their evaluations), then why are MM's so dang successful in the NCAA tourny against HM teams?
TechSideline.com (a.k.a. TSL) is an independent publication that is in no way affiliated with or sponsored by Virginia Tech or the Virginia Tech Athletic Department. This site is best viewed using Mozilla Firefox or MS Internet Explorer at a video resolution of 1024x768 or higher. For more details, including a list of TechSideline staff, see our Contact Page. All original material and images are copyrighted by TechSideline.com and may not be reused or reprinted without permission.