Become a TSL Sponsor

Banner Ad

 Forgot Password?
Florida State Board of Trustees Chairman blasted ACC.
SPONSORED BY
Page 1 of 10 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 95

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Hokie!
    Join Date
    June 06, 2006
    Posts
    226

    Florida State Board of Trustees Chairman blasted ACC.

    ACC surrendered all third tier television rights for football to ESPN/ABC but kept them for men's basketball. That arrangement will likely result in substantial revenue for schools with a strong basketball following like North Carolina and Duke.On the other hand, it will do very little for schools with a more traditional football following like FSU, Clemson, Virginia Tech and Miami.

    http://floridastate.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1364755

  2. #2

    Join Date
    October 08, 1999
    Posts
    27,298
    Quote Originally Posted by baxao View Post
    ACC surrendered all third tier television rights for football to ESPN/ABC but kept them for men's basketball. That arrangement will likely result in substantial revenue for schools with a strong basketball following like North Carolina and Duke.On the other hand, it will do very little for schools with a more traditional football following like FSU, Clemson, Virginia Tech and Miami.

    http://floridastate.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1364755
    Someone please educate me on tv rights, why would the acc package be more advantageous to the NC schools? I thought these tv rights "packages were share and share alike"?

  3. #3
    Hokie!
    Join Date
    June 06, 2006
    Posts
    226
    Third tier rights are for any games not selected by the first or second-tier rights. Third tier rights are often sold per school basis to regional networks and not negotiated by the conference (ACC in this case).

    The ESPN contract includes third tier rights revenue but not basketball. ESPN will sell the third tier football rights to regional networks.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    July 03, 2001
    Posts
    102,720
    so basically FSU is admitting they aren't good enough to be on either tier 1 or tier 2 regularly. Must be a big market for a 3-4 loss in conf FSU team playing Duke, MD, etc. If FSU was what they apparently still think they are, this would probably be a lot less of a deal to them.

  5. #5
    Hokie! hokie_jayhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 17, 2005
    Posts
    2,538
    Quote Originally Posted by gern View Post
    so basically FSU is admitting they aren't good enough to be on either tier 1 or tier 2 regularly. Must be a big market for a 3-4 loss in conf FSU team playing Duke, MD, etc. If FSU was what they apparently still think they are, this would probably be a lot less of a deal to them.
    Kansas has arguably been the best national basketball program over the last 5 years, yet they still play about 10 games a year that aren't picked up one a first or 2nd tier basis so they make millions off these tier 3 games. The top programs will have games that aren't chosen, and when that happens, they'll make a heck of a lot more off tier 3 than Florida State will.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    July 03, 2001
    Posts
    102,720
    doesn't KU play like 40 BB games? So 1/4 of the games aren't covered by T1-T2. If FSU was better in the ACC, they'd probably only have 2 (max) games not covered. But alas they aren't the FSU from the 90s anymore. They are not VT from the 00s either. Their self image is about as realistic right now as the Domers'.
    Last edited by gern; Sat May 12 2012 at 09:07 PM. Reason: typo : / ^2

  7. #7

    Join Date
    September 19, 2002
    Posts
    9,955
    Quote Originally Posted by gern View Post
    doesn't KU play like 40 BB games? So 1/4 of the games aren't covered by T1-T2. If FSU was better in the ACC, they'd probably only have 2 (max) games not covered. But alas they aren't the FSU from the 90s anymore. They are not VT from the 00s either. Their self image is about as realistic right now as the Domers'.
    But those games could still mean an additional $2M to $5M to the program, depending on the program, nothing to scoff at. The big programs make anywhere from $5M to $7M a year in Tier 3 programming rights. For example, NCST negotiated a $4.9M/year contract over 10 years to a regional network, that's big bucks.
    Last edited by HOKIE-SAN; Sun May 13 2012 at 01:40 PM.

  8. #8
    Andy Bitter weighs in on the FSU rumors.

    http://blogs.roanoke.com/andybitterv...ness-for-real/
    "It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first." Ronald Reagan

  9. #9
    BUGGZY's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 15, 2002
    Location
    Annandale, VA
    Posts
    13,711
    Quote Originally Posted by HOKIE-SAN View Post
    But those games could still mean an additional $2M to $5M to the program, depending on the program, nothing to scoff at. The big programs make anywhere from $5M to $7M a year in Tier 3 programming rights. For example, NCST negotiated a $4.9M/year contract over 10 years to a regional network, that's big bucks.
    if NCSU did that, than FSU is free to do it as well. both schools have the exact same Tier 3 rights available to them...just saying...
    "This no more resembles that than something unlike something else resembles that." - Loosely quoting PHNC

  10. #10

    Join Date
    September 19, 2002
    Posts
    16,756
    No, but FSU duke, FSU bc etc aren't tier 1 or 2 at any time, so if they can package their tier 3 and sell it they can make bank. And in the big 12 they would have more tier 1 or 2 games.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •