ACC surrendered all third tier television rights for football to ESPN/ABC but kept them for men's basketball. That arrangement will likely result in substantial revenue for schools with a strong basketball following like North Carolina and Duke.On the other hand, it will do very little for schools with a more traditional football following like FSU, Clemson, Virginia Tech and Miami.
http://floridastate.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1364755
Hybrid View
-
Sat May 12 2012, 04:47 PM #1Hokie!
- Join Date
- June 06, 2006
- Posts
- 226
Florida State Board of Trustees Chairman blasted ACC.
-
Sat May 12 2012, 05:27 PM #2
- Join Date
- October 08, 1999
- Posts
- 27,298
-
Sat May 12 2012, 05:55 PM #3Hokie!
- Join Date
- June 06, 2006
- Posts
- 226
Third tier rights are for any games not selected by the first or second-tier rights. Third tier rights are often sold per school basis to regional networks and not negotiated by the conference (ACC in this case).
The ESPN contract includes third tier rights revenue but not basketball. ESPN will sell the third tier football rights to regional networks.
-
Sat May 12 2012, 07:41 PM #4
- Join Date
- July 03, 2001
- Posts
- 102,720
so basically FSU is admitting they aren't good enough to be on either tier 1 or tier 2 regularly. Must be a big market for a 3-4 loss in conf FSU team playing Duke, MD, etc. If FSU was what they apparently still think they are, this would probably be a lot less of a deal to them.
-
Sat May 12 2012, 07:57 PM #5
Kansas has arguably been the best national basketball program over the last 5 years, yet they still play about 10 games a year that aren't picked up one a first or 2nd tier basis so they make millions off these tier 3 games. The top programs will have games that aren't chosen, and when that happens, they'll make a heck of a lot more off tier 3 than Florida State will.
-
Sat May 12 2012, 09:06 PM #6
- Join Date
- July 03, 2001
- Posts
- 102,720
doesn't KU play like 40 BB games? So 1/4 of the games aren't covered by T1-T2. If FSU was better in the ACC, they'd probably only have 2 (max) games not covered. But alas they aren't the FSU from the 90s anymore. They are not VT from the 00s either. Their self image is about as realistic right now as the Domers'.
Last edited by gern; Sat May 12 2012 at 09:07 PM. Reason: typo : / ^2
-
Sun May 13 2012, 01:25 PM #7
- Join Date
- September 19, 2002
- Posts
- 9,955
But those games could still mean an additional $2M to $5M to the program, depending on the program, nothing to scoff at. The big programs make anywhere from $5M to $7M a year in Tier 3 programming rights. For example, NCST negotiated a $4.9M/year contract over 10 years to a regional network, that's big bucks.
Last edited by HOKIE-SAN; Sun May 13 2012 at 01:40 PM.
-
Sun May 13 2012, 02:35 PM #8
- Join Date
- October 07, 1999
- Posts
- 17,646
Andy Bitter weighs in on the FSU rumors.
http://blogs.roanoke.com/andybitterv...ness-for-real/"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first." Ronald Reagan
-
Sun May 13 2012, 04:00 PM #9
-
Sun May 13 2012, 10:24 PM #10
- Join Date
- September 19, 2002
- Posts
- 16,756
No, but FSU duke, FSU bc etc aren't tier 1 or 2 at any time, so if they can package their tier 3 and sell it they can make bank. And in the big 12 they would have more tier 1 or 2 games.



Reply With Quote


