Exactly. If he had simply fired him without all the advertisement, and without all the innuendo in that press conference, I'd still be disappointed and think its the wrong decision.... but I wouldn't be wondering why we took a classless path to do so. He said he didn't want to throw Greenberg under the bus.... but by answering some of the questions the way he did (saying it wasn't about wins or tournament appearances), he did just that....
If he wanted to bring up the innuendo and give reasoning, fine, he should have told us what those reasons were if they were so bad as to fire him at a very unusual (and detrimental) time. I agree with you that he should've just fired him (if that was the decision he made) without all the fanfare, we'd assume its for performance reasons, and that is that. Some disagree, some wouldn't. But we wouldn't be left here wondering what this innuendo is that only a few seem to know.... going back to what SteveinBaltimore said in his "epic" post, the people with this "inside info", including Weaver, need to either keep the fact that there IS inside info to themselves, or share the exact reasons why he was fired and why he isnt a "part of the vt family". What has happened instead just makes our whole athletic dept look bad
Results 1 to 10 of 78
Threaded View
-
Wed Apr 25 2012, 12:04 PM #48Hokie!
- Join Date
- July 09, 2011
- Posts
- 2,349



Reply With Quote

