Chances of Everhart to VT?

[Groff]

What vehement SG defenders have been saying they don't want Everhart? Obviously, a "vehement SG defender" doesn't want a change at all, so in that respect they don't want Everhart. But I haven't seen anyone who has been a "vehement SG defender" (how many of us are there left? me? Crooked Road? One or two others?) say anything specifically bad about Everhart, other than to point out to the "vehement SG opposers" that if you don't want SG, you shouldn't want Everhart either, because the reasons cited for wanting Greenberg gone don't paint Everhart in a good light either.

Which is just what you said. I just don't know who the people are that you see that are in denial.

Really?

In this thread alone, Crooked Road said that Everhart "stinks," That hiring him even as an assistant would be "That would be a huge mistake for the program" and if he were to ever be head coach, it "would set the program back to Bobby Hussey levels."

That's just one poster in one thread, and let's stop pretending that there isn't a whole cadre of "Seth's Soldiers" on this board now, come on. You really think it's just you and crooked road? Shoot, I don't even see you as that vehement of a defender of the guy compared to a lot of other posters on here.

I feel my point stands, is valid, and is in the same vein as yours - There are remarkable similarities between the two guys, and pretending like one is or will be great while the other is or will be terrible is merely viewing the issue through a particular "partisan" lens (for lack of a better word). Do you agree?