Quote Originally Posted by SteveInBaltimore View Post
If the biggest complaint about Greenberg is "1 NCAA in 9 years", and people want to get rid of him before his contract is up because of that, then there is no way on earth any of those people could POSSIBLY want us to hire a guy who has been a head coach for 18 years and had ZERO NCAA appearances. No way at all.

And doing better than the previous coaches is certainly not something that people who want to fire Greenberg care about, so I don't see why they would be impressed with Everhart on that basis.

The bottom line is that no one who wants Greenberg gone could possibly want Everhart to be his successor.
I dont particularly care about this either way, but my point was that the situation in reverse is also funny: is three NCAA appearances really that much more than none. Either way, its a really really small number. So, the fact that the vehement SG defenders would say that his zero appearances means he would be a poor choice for a hire is also funny.

Like i said originally, i think the two guys are probably much, much more alike than they are different, but people are so married to their "team" in all of this they cant or wont admit it.