Has VT ever had a good fit? since 1980 I think Seth has been the best fit. The biggest problems Seth's teams have had is losing the lions share of close games.
Results 41 to 50 of 66
-
Mon Feb 13 2012, 08:56 PM #41
- Join Date
- December 22, 1999
- Posts
- 5,752
-
Mon Feb 13 2012, 09:32 PM #42
-
Mon Feb 13 2012, 09:36 PM #43Lurker
- Join Date
- February 12, 2012
- Posts
- 23
I feel like starting a new board called "Men's Basketball, no hysteria allowed"
I agree. These past two months are the most disappointed I have ever been as a Hokie fan. Generally I believe we have one of the most reasonable, rational fan bases in the country, with a good perspective on what is important in college sports. But these attacks on Coach Greenberg have changed my mind.
Here we have a coach who has completely turned around a program that was in the crapper, beaten the best teams in the nation several times, and made us respectable in the best conference in the country, and many of our fans want to run him out on a rail because he is from New York and demonstrates "antics".
Here we are in the midst of a rebuilding season, with our best recruiting class ever, and a team that is still competitive (remember Wake Forest last year?), and all of a sudden he can't coach? Does anyone realize that it is his chip-on-a-shoulder mentality that allows him to recruit pretty good players here, who also happen to have the same "I'll show you" mentality (Delaney, Allen, Dowdell, etc.)? Has any other VT coach ever gotten better players to come to Blacksburg?
I'm sorry, but I think Coach Greenberg is the best thing that ever happened to Hokie sports. I guess if we can find a coach that can do a better job of attracting mostly inner city African-American kids to a small town in the Appalachians, with no night life, a small African-American population, and weak fan support, and do it without cheating, then by all means, lets go hire him. As our 'gurus' have pointed out many times, this is just not reality.
By the way, I'm amazed at how much smarter many of our posters are than those gurus, some of whom basically earn their living studying college basketball. I wonder how those dissenters would react if someone came into their workplace where they spend 50 hours a week becoming expert in their jobs and told them they were wrong. I suspect Cville and RevZeke have forgotten more about today's game than most of us ever knew.
I'm sure I didn't change anyone's opinion. But I think we will all rue the day the "fans" run Coach Greenberg out of town.[/QUOTE]
-
Mon Feb 13 2012, 09:52 PM #44Lurker
- Join Date
- February 12, 2012
- Posts
- 23
-
Mon Feb 13 2012, 09:55 PM #45
So glad I wasn't on the boards this afternoon, I might've had an aneurysm...
-
Mon Feb 13 2012, 10:01 PM #46Lurker
- Join Date
- February 12, 2012
- Posts
- 23
-
Mon Feb 13 2012, 10:18 PM #47
- Join Date
- January 05, 2001
- Posts
- 14,890
It's gotten bad lately. Part of what makes this site so great is the stability from the top down. Rarely over-reactionary. Unless its a big win or game that requires a positive riling of the fan base.
Now we see multiple pieces that seem dead set on establishing an overarching decade-long narrative on the heels of a rebuilding year. I like the content here because its more Grantland than Jim Rome. It provides contextual analysis and reason over emotion.
Id hate to see that change.
-
Mon Feb 13 2012, 10:28 PM #48Lurker
- Join Date
- February 12, 2012
- Posts
- 23
-
Mon Feb 13 2012, 10:40 PM #49Hokie!
- Join Date
- May 16, 2003
- Posts
- 2,462
Even if these characterizations were true, which I do not subscribe to, CSG does have a self-limiting problem in that he sees himselve as a victim, which translates to the overall team mindset.
You may win a few big games with the "chip on the shoulder" mindset, but a a player can not see himself both as a victim and a winner at the same time.
This explains why we have managed a few big wins with CSG only to flame out with a truely underpar peformance against teams that we should beat. E.g., BC on senior night last year after beating Duke, blowing a NCAAT bid.
Also, CSG has shown a tin ear when it comes to the politics surrounding the selection committee. His certifiably insane statement ensures that all things being equal, VT will not get a break from that group. Not being selected by the selection committee feeds right back into the victim mindset where CSG seems the most comfortable.
Lastly, his past habit of riding the refs way too hard (a further manisfestation of a victim mindset) has rubbed off on both the refs, our players, TV announcers and our fans. The latter 2 points have not been a positive for the image of our university and have contributed to our lack of success in post season play in the NCAAT.
As I have stated before, none of this makes him a bad coach, but it explains why his upside is limited, which is substantiated by his lifetime record.
I would hope that none of what I have said is construed as a CSG "hater", but if so, so be it.
-
Mon Feb 13 2012, 10:56 PM #50
It's funny you say this, because most times I hear him speak after setbacks like injuries, etc., he always says the exact opposite of that. The guy has faced some serious adversity during his time here, but he's always said they're not going to make excuses for themselves.
When we got snubbed last year, what was his response? He said that the NCAA committee could not take away the accomplishments of his group of kids. That's not a victim, that's someone being proud and defiant. That's a hard-edge, chip-on-shoulder mentality that his best teams have always displayed.


Reply With Quote



