Become a TSL Sponsor

Banner Ad

 Forgot Password?
Page 1 of 75 12345671151 ... LastLast
Threads 1 to 20 of 1494

Forum: Conference Realignment

For discussing college football's inexorable march towards superconferences and a playoff.

    The ACC's fixation with private universities - I85Hokie Tue Jun 18 2013 08:24 AM
    It's gone up quite a bit, despite inviting BC. - lawhokie Tue Jun 18 2013 04:26 PM
    Yep, and they nearly lost others as well. Thread contains no text - chuckd4vt Tue Jun 18 2013 02:33 PM
    WVU?? High Road?? Your statement was TIC, right? Thread contains no text - Hokiefan5 Tue Jun 18 2013 02:52 PM
    LOL - what a load of BS. - lawhokie Wed Jun 19 2013 08:52 AM
    Wake, Duke, and truly innovative thinking by the ACC. - lawhokie Thu Jun 13 2013 06:17 PM
    ...or the SEC. Thread contains no text - 133304Hokie Mon Jun 17 2013 12:47 PM
    Sorry but that argument fails on many levels. - lawhokie Sun Jun 16 2013 09:05 PM
    oops. meant for TwoTechs Thread contains no text - Maroon Baboon Sat Jun 15 2013 03:38 PM
    For such a small school, Wofford has a nice stadium: ... Thread contains a url - crabcake77 Sat Jun 15 2013 07:21 PM
    Wake has the same design as Lane and Indiana's stadium. Thread contains no text Thread contains a url - Calamitous Sun Jun 16 2013 08:50 AM
    Couldn't agree more. Thread contains no text - Femoyer Hokie Sun Jun 16 2013 04:56 PM
    This lady was calling the shots. ... Thread contains an image - Old Line Hokie Sun Jun 16 2013 01:52 PM
    The BOV and president disagrees - Mercury Fri Jun 14 2013 12:08 PM
    Could have been as Irish bait only. Thread contains no text - lawhokie Fri Jun 14 2013 08:50 AM
    I would love this, but it's never gonna happen. Thread contains no text - Freddyburg Hokie Thu Jun 13 2013 06:46 PM
    Isn't just about every ACC school a partial member? - lawhokie Sun Jun 16 2013 09:17 PM
    You're absolutely right... - Calamitous Mon Jun 17 2013 12:40 AM
    Louisville continues their domination of the NCAA Thread contains a url - Truthahn Wed Jun 12 2013 11:08 AM
    Did UMD get a check? Thread contains no text - 33laszlo99 Wed Jun 12 2013 02:03 PM
    We need NCAA permission to do away with divisions? Thread contains no text - laphroaig Sun Jun 09 2013 02:48 PM
    Like NASCAR. Top 2 teams make "the Chase." Uhh, no thanks. Thread contains no text - Maroon Baboon Sun Jun 09 2013 10:14 PM
    And it would be worse if they played in Charlotte or Tampa Thread contains no text - Maroon Baboon Mon Jun 10 2013 12:53 PM
    Sorry, my error, first BC game was in Jacksonville Thread contains no text - Mark425Hokie Tue Jun 11 2013 07:48 AM
    Correct. Thread contains no text - Femoyer Hokie Mon Jun 10 2013 06:12 PM
    Spot on! Thread contains no text - MPHOKIE Sun Jun 09 2013 08:33 PM
    Okay, I'll take a shot.... EAST Maryland Michigan Michigan... - SuwaneeHokie820 Tue Jun 11 2013 11:49 AM
    I like it Thread contains no text - 132555Hokie Sun Jun 09 2013 07:15 PM
    This is the best proposal. Thread contains no text - techman Sat Jun 08 2013 10:49 PM
    Maybe I'll polish the writing and send it to Swofford. Thanks Thread contains no text - Maroon Baboon Sun Jun 09 2013 01:22 AM
    It shows up fine on my end... problem's on your end. :( Thread contains no text - Hokie CPA Sat Jun 08 2013 05:03 PM
    I see the same problem Thread contains no text - Maroon Baboon Sat Jun 08 2013 05:47 PM
    What are your cross overs? Thread contains no text - Stech Sat Jun 08 2013 04:51 PM
    [TR] [TD]ATLANTIC[/TD] [TD]COASTAL[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]FSU[/TD] [TD]GT[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Miami[/TD] [TD]dook[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Clemson[/TD] [TD]NCSU[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]VT[/TD] [TD]L'ville[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]uva[/TD] [TD]UNC[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Pitt[/TD] [TD]Wake[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]BC[/TD] [TD]'cuse[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] or the "build from rivalries" format: [TABLE="class: grid, width: 200, align: center"] [TR] [TD]Virgolina[/TD] [TD]NorSo[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]UNC[/TD] [TD]Pitt[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]uva[/TD] [TD]'Cuse[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]NCSU[/TD] [TD]L'ville[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]dook[/TD] [TD]Miami[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]VT[/TD] [TD]GT[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Clemson[/TD] [TD]FSU[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Wake[/TD] [TD]BC[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] With the Virgolina format, you could theoretically eliminate the need for crossovers unless you want to protect FSU v Clemson. by eliminating the crossovers, you could stay at 8 game schedule and we would play everyone in the NorSo division once every 3.5 years and home/home every 6 or 7 (max). ie: [TABLE="class: grid, width: 250, align: center"] [TR] [TD]YEAR 1[/TD] [TD]@FSU[/TD] [TD]'cuse[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 2[/TD] [TD]@BC[/TD] [TD]Miami[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 3 (@ND)[/TD] [TD]@GT[/TD] [TD]Pitt[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 4[/TD] [TD]@L'ville[/TD] [TD]FSU[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 5[/TD] [TD]@'cuse[/TD] [TD]BC[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 6 (ND)[/TD] [TD]@Miami[/TD] [TD]GT[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 7[/TD] [TD]@Pitt[/TD] [TD]L'ville[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] and for the NorSo division teams, knowing that the Virgolina region is an important recruiting area, all 7 NorSo teams would play at least 1 game in the Virgolina region every year and host at least 1 team from that region every year. hell, if FSU and Clemson insist on playing one another, tell them ok, as long as they agree to a 9 game schedule, too. then, using the crossovers as listed above, it would only take 6 years to play every one twice: (GT is our annual crossover) [TABLE="class: grid, width: 250, align: center"] [TR] [TD]YEAR 1[/TD] [TD]@FSU[/TD] [TD]'cuse[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 2[/TD] [TD]@BC[/TD] [TD]Miami[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 3 (@ND)[/TD] [TD]@L'ville[/TD] [TD]Pitt[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 4[/TD] [TD]@'cuse[/TD] [TD]FSU[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 5[/TD] [TD]@Miami[/TD] [TD]BC[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 6 (ND)[/TD] [TD]@Pitt[/TD] [TD]L'ville[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] I just made this up for fun, but not i really like my Virgolina idea. thoughts?" class="threadlink" href="showthread.php?p=780001#post780001">how about the every other state method (with crossover rivals as listed): ... - BUGGZY Sat Jun 08 2013 11:51 PM
    [TR] [TD]ATLANTIC[/TD] [TD]COASTAL[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]FSU[/TD] [TD]GT[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Miami[/TD] [TD]dook[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Clemson[/TD] [TD]NCSU[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]VT[/TD] [TD]L'ville[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]uva[/TD] [TD]UNC[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Pitt[/TD] [TD]Wake[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]BC[/TD] [TD]'cuse[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] or the "build from rivalries" format: [TABLE="class: grid, width: 200, align: center"] [TR] [TD]Virgolina[/TD] [TD]NorSo[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]UNC[/TD] [TD]Pitt[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]uva[/TD] [TD]'Cuse[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]NCSU[/TD] [TD]L'ville[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]dook[/TD] [TD]Miami[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]VT[/TD] [TD]GT[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Clemson[/TD] [TD]FSU[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Wake[/TD] [TD]BC[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] With the Virgolina format, you could theoretically eliminate the need for crossovers unless you want to protect FSU v Clemson. by eliminating the crossovers, you could stay at 8 game schedule and we would play everyone in the NorSo division once every 3.5 years and home/home every 6 or 7 (max). ie: [TABLE="class: grid, width: 250, align: center"] [TR] [TD]YEAR 1[/TD] [TD]@FSU[/TD] [TD]'cuse[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 2[/TD] [TD]@BC[/TD] [TD]Miami[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 3 (@ND)[/TD] [TD]@GT[/TD] [TD]Pitt[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 4[/TD] [TD]@L'ville[/TD] [TD]FSU[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 5[/TD] [TD]@'cuse[/TD] [TD]BC[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 6 (ND)[/TD] [TD]@Miami[/TD] [TD]GT[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 7[/TD] [TD]@Pitt[/TD] [TD]L'ville[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] and for the NorSo division teams, knowing that the Virgolina region is an important recruiting area, all 7 NorSo teams would play at least 1 game in the Virgolina region every year and host at least 1 team from that region every year. hell, if FSU and Clemson insist on playing one another, tell them ok, as long as they agree to a 9 game schedule, too. then, using the crossovers as listed above, it would only take 6 years to play every one twice: (GT is our annual crossover) [TABLE="class: grid, width: 250, align: center"] [TR] [TD]YEAR 1[/TD] [TD]@FSU[/TD] [TD]'cuse[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 2[/TD] [TD]@BC[/TD] [TD]Miami[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 3 (@ND)[/TD] [TD]@L'ville[/TD] [TD]Pitt[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 4[/TD] [TD]@'cuse[/TD] [TD]FSU[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 5[/TD] [TD]@Miami[/TD] [TD]BC[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]YEAR 6 (ND)[/TD] [TD]@Pitt[/TD] [TD]L'ville[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] I just made this up for fun, but not i really like my Virgolina idea. thoughts?[/QUOTE] Overall, either idea could work, but I do wonder if there would be any negative from a marketing standpoint. When conferences go with geographical basis for their divisions, they generally prefer clean divisions (east-west or north-south) or as clean as possible (in the Big Ten's case). I suspect the SEC's divisional alignment is only temporary until it decides who #15 and #16 members are so Missouri could shift to West Division with Alabama and Auburn possibly shifting to the East Division, so people are willing to live with the SEC's temporary funkiness. If the ACC were to adopt either suggestion, then is there a possibility that from a national standpoint it could be received as "warmly" as the Big Ten's Leaders and Legends divisional alignment? If so, then can the ACC afford to take another negative hit on its image?" class="threadlink" href="showthread.php?p=781751#post781751">Overall, either idea could work, but I do wonder if there would be any negative... - VTHokie2000 Tue Jun 11 2013 04:15 PM
    [TR] [TD]NORTH[/TD] [TD]SOUTH[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]BC[/TD] [TD]Miami[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]'Cuse[/TD] [TD]NCSU[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Pitt[/TD] [TD]GT[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][I][B]uva[/B][/I][/TD] [TD][I][B]UNC[/B][/I][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]VT[/TD] [TD]Clemson[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]L'ville[/TD] [TD]FSU[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B][I]Wake[/I][/B][/TD] [TD][B][I]Dook[/I][/B][/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] I have highlighted the 2 rivalries i'm willing to maintain as annual crossovers. everyone else plays 3 rotating crossover games each year.[/QUOTE] I would have no problem with a north-south split either. I suspect if Wake had to go to the North Division, then it would want at least 2 protected cross-division games (i.e. Duke and NC State). Maybe even 3 if you include UNC too. This is the reason I have been saying that the 4 NC schools would either all need to be in the same division or split evenly because the 1 NC school (i.e. Wake in this case) would be too much on an island from the other in-state schools. It would be like VT having to decide whether it protects its cross-divisional game with UVA, Miami, or potentially even Louisville (assuming all 3 schools are in the opposite division from VT). The problem the Big Ten will run into with having only 1 protected cross-divisional game is it will create a quirk with the future cross-divisional rotation schedule. Depending on the number of protected games will mean 1 team will have its rotation "bumped" out at least 1 year because of the "protected" team. For example, if it was VT's turn in the rotation to play UNC, then the game could be delayed 1 year because UVA has to play UNC every year. 1 year isn't so much a big deal until you see the ripple effect that it creates with the future schedule. The following year when VT and UVA plays UNC, then 2 teams will get "bumped" from their normal rotation. The ripple will get to the point where some schools are playing schools in the rotation pool multiple times before having an opportunity to play a "protected" school. Also, it could lead to scheduling issues (i.e. a team is tentatively scheduled to play the same team twice in a season) which will only lead to more "bumps" with the teams from the rotation pool. I suspect the only reason the Big Ten agreed to this format is because it knew this would be only temporary until it found 2 more schools so Indiana and Purdue could end up in the same division (most likely West Division given the rivalries between the Illinois and Indiana schools)." class="threadlink" href="showthread.php?p=781839#post781839">I would have no problem with a north-south split either. I suspect if Wake had... - VTHokie2000 Tue Jun 11 2013 05:39 PM
    [TR] [TD][B]South Pod [/B][/TD] [TD][B]Mid Pod A [/B][/TD] [TD][B]Mid Pod B [/B][/TD] [TD][B]North Pod [/B][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Miami[/TD] [TD]North Carolina[/TD] [TD]Virginia[/TD] [TD]Boston College[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Florida State[/TD] [TD]NC State[/TD] [TD]Virginia Tech[/TD] [TD]Pittsburgh[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Clemson[/TD] [TD]Duke[/TD] [TD]Wake Forest[/TD] [TD]Syracuse[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Georgia Tech[/TD] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [TD]Louisville[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] You rotate the two Mid Pods so they play in the same division as the South Pod for two years and then they play in the same division as the North Pod two years. That's 6 conference games within your division each year. The other two conference games (assuming we stay at 8 conference games) would be filled out so that the two Mid Pods crossover on a rotating basis (we would play each team in MPA home and away every 3 years) and the North and South pods would crossover on a rotating basis (Miami would play each North pod team home and away every 4 years). You do away with the permanent crossovers, so the only teams you play every year are in your pod, but you play everybody at a minimum twice (home and away) every four years.[/QUOTE] i like the concept, but i get frustrated when people downplay (or ignore) the importance of rivalries in college football. uva-unc is the oldest rivalry in the south. sure, it's not important nationally, but regional rivalries are what make college football great. you have to find a way to preserve all of these games on an annual basis. you can salvage this within your format by using the 2 non-division games as flex games rather than any fixed rotation or format. in years rivals aren't in the same division, you just use one or both of the flex games to address it. for unc-uva and dook-wake in your example, they would always have to use one of the flex games. nc state and clemson would have to use a flex game 2 out of every 4 years. any unused flex games can be used to either play made for TV matchups in the league or match up teams who have gone more than 2 years without playing." class="threadlink" href="showthread.php?p=779800#post779800">i like the concept, but i get frustrated when people downplay (or ignore) the... - BUGGZY Sat Jun 08 2013 01:07 PM
    Are you saying that's not true? Thread contains no text - Byting Gobbler Sun Jun 09 2013 11:35 PM
    That was pre-2010... - Calamitous Sat Jun 08 2013 06:06 PM
    College Football in the South vs. North ... Thread contains a url - VaAkita Mon Jun 10 2013 04:14 PM
    Correct. it will take a couple of years. Thread contains no text - Femoyer Hokie Fri Jun 07 2013 10:06 AM
    Interesting. Thread contains no text - crabcake77 Thu Jun 06 2013 10:16 AM
    NC State or Louisville make the most sense... - Calamitous Thu Jun 06 2013 07:34 PM
    And the big OOC games are often cancelled or pushed back. Thread contains no text - Femoyer Hokie Wed Jun 05 2013 08:01 PM
    Do you work in sales? ;) Thread contains no text - BUGGZY Thu Jun 06 2013 05:04 PM
    thanks for the laugh Thread contains no text - Hokie'79 Wed Jun 05 2013 12:40 PM
    I just wish they had fans. Thread contains no text - chuckd4vt Wed Jun 05 2013 01:33 AM
    ESPN Radio reporting that Gee is retiring in July. - GreatSmokieHokie Tue Jun 04 2013 04:03 PM
    :eek: Thread contains no text - Freddyburg Hokie Fri Jun 07 2013 10:39 AM
    He's only retiring from his university post. - lawhokie Tue Jun 04 2013 10:26 PM
    Fear is a powerful motivator..... - NW Raleigh Hokie Wed Jun 05 2013 12:43 PM
    Duke, UVA, UNC, and Miami have a ton of Jersey kids too. Thread contains no text - chuckd4vt Tue Jun 04 2013 11:38 PM
    Yes. Thread contains no text - Stech Tue Jun 04 2013 07:59 PM
    I'd take Texas and Oklahoma and three anybodies. - lawhokie Tue Jun 04 2013 01:15 PM
    The B1G taking on a partial member... Thread contains a url - BUGGZY Mon Jun 03 2013 10:10 AM
    The B1G didn't lose anybody and the ACC lost Maryland. - lawhokie Tue Jun 04 2013 08:59 AM
    We need to get Lacrosse asap! Thread contains a url - Truthahn Tue Jun 04 2013 10:09 PM
    True enough. Thread contains no text - Femoyer Hokie Mon Jun 03 2013 07:06 PM
    Then look at it in a way that really matters... - lawhokie Mon Jun 03 2013 11:59 AM
    This, I think, is the answer !!! Thread contains no text - 133193Hokie Mon Jun 03 2013 02:48 PM
    RE: Ivy League - EarthX Mon Jun 03 2013 01:02 PM
    Isn't the University of Chicago a CIC member? Thread contains no text - lawhokie Mon Jun 03 2013 12:01 PM
    Off the top of my head, I can think of IX reasons why they weren't. Thread contains no text - Freddyburg Hokie Mon Jun 03 2013 10:55 AM

Thread Display Options

Use this control to limit the display of threads to those newer than the specified time frame.

Allows you to choose the data by which the thread list will be sorted.

Order threads in...

Note: when sorting by date, 'descending order' will show the newest results first.

Icon Legend

Contains unread posts
Contains unread posts
Contains no unread posts
Contains no unread posts
More than 20 replies or 1000 views
Hot thread with unread posts
More than 20 replies or 1000 views
Hot thread with no unread posts
Closed Thread
Thread is closed
Thread Contains a Message Written By You
You have posted in this thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •